Alexandre Holroyd: “Macron’s Presidency will not have a huge impact on Brexit per se, but on the future of the EU” - LSE
LSE, 26 May 2017
Alexandre Holroyd is the En Marche! candidate representing the French living in Northern Europe. In a recent panel discussion organised by the 1989 Generation Initiative, he discussed the implications of Macron’s presidency for Brexit, the future of the European Union and the importance of the upcoming elections in France for the next five years ...
What is Macron’s position on the European Union?
The decision of En Marche! to run an openly pro-European campaign puzzled most political commentators. At a major meeting on 10 December in Paris, Macron dedicated a third of his speech to the European project, something that had not occurred in France since the late 90s.
The party truly believes that the future of France and its economic prosperity lies in Europe. This Europhile position is both an emotional one linked to the memory of the war and the role the EU played in building peace, and a pragmatic one linked to the single market and the economic opportunities it offers. This position has traditionally been defended by the UK with France being on the other side of the table.
Finally, this position is realistic, the election of Donald Trump has accelerated the perception that the US is withdrawing slowly from Europe, combined with difficult relations with Russia, there is a need to federate both European defence efforts and security intelligence capacities.
What are the implications of a Macron presidency for Brexit?
In the first six to eight months, there will be little open criticism of the European Commission’s conduct of the negotiations. Indeed, enormous efforts are being made to show a complete alignment of all the European positions behind the chief negotiator, Michel Barnier. This is a fundamental element of what Brexit is going to look like from a French perspective.
The British press coverage of Macron’s position on Brexit, reporting that he wants to punish the UK by making it less competitive is wrong. However, the reality is a strong desire to make France more competitive and attractive and I do not believe that this has to be done at the expense of the UK.
As for the Brexit negotiations, very few people in France do believe that it will be settled within the allocated two years. The complexity of EU decision-making, which includes twenty-six regulatory bodies who sift through secondary legislation on all sorts of policy issues and the UK will be subject to these for the foreseeable future, for at least eight to ten years.
It is unlikely that by the two years timeframe, the UK and the EU will have a full exit deal. However, I think that the highly political issues (i.e citizen’s rights, budget) will be solved during that period and then a long transitional period is likely to be established to negotiate the different regulatory mechanisms.
Macron’s Presidency will not have an enormous impact on Brexit per se, but rather on the future of the European Union. While there was a narrative in the UK that the EU will fall apart and that right-wing candidates are going to sweep across the continent, there is instead a drive at the moment to push Europe forward following the elections in Austria, the Netherlands and France. But that is going to be an enormous challenge because, in the last twenty years, there has been a growing anxiety on what direction the European project is taking.
To address that, Macron has developed a measure in his programme called a ‘democratic convention’ that will be launched by the end of 2017 in all the Member States. The objective is to grasp what the citizens expect from the EU taking into account the coherence in different countries. It is similar to the way the En Marche programme was developed by crowdsourcing information from hundreds of local committees across the country, which was followed by experts working with the results to translate them into concrete policy proposals.
This is how the party ranked its key priorities: employment, education and the European Union. The idea is to replicate this methodology at the European level, working with academics and experts, to end up with a clear idea of where the EU project should go and potentially a treaty reform based on the results of the democratic convention. The key objective is to defend an EU that can advance without unanimity, with different levels of integration than those that already exist in some policy areas such as the Eurozone.